Good Luck Chuck (2007)
I ain't watched this shit and don't plan to. WTF Jessica Alba. If you don't want to be in garbagey, degrading roles that require you to strip to your underwear for some "awesome" 3-second shot that millions of people somehow think is alone worth $10, there are two letters I can sell you at the low, low price of one Fantastic Four movie's salary per letter.
As for Dane Cook...what can I say, man, keep on truckin'.
As for Dane Cook...what can I say, man, keep on truckin'.
posted by Jon @ 11:53 PM
4 Comments:
At 1:19 PM,
ian said…
I would not watch this movie because of Dane Cook. I really don't see how people think he's funny. And as a matter of fact, I am one of those people who'd see it for Alba's panty shot but, well, already seen it in the promo. So there's no chance at me watching this period.
At 9:50 PM,
Jon said…
I say we should rate it by the number of watch checks we make during an arbitrary period of time equal to the length of the film. I'm going to use my morning routine before work, which since I watch the clock constantly to make sure I'm not late, amounts to...40 watch checks!
That score is way negative.
At 12:06 AM,
ian said…
So wait, am I reading this right? You want watch checks as a rate? Like 1.5 checks per hour?
Or it's like, if I watch the 3 hour long Titanic (which I never have and never will) and check my watch 6 times, that's equivalent to checking my watch 4 times during the two hour long film, The Notebook?
At 7:33 AM,
Jon said…
I think I misspoke. While statistically that would make the most sense, this sure ain't statistics. Otherwise people would be giving movies, like, stars per hour.
And on that note, since we're not treating watch checks relative to a period of time, I might as well dump the number of times I've checked my watch in the past week on GLC.
New conversion factor: 1 GLC = 100 watch checks.
Post a Comment
<< Home