we're buddies. we're real good buddies.

people review stuff

Sunday, October 28, 2007

Solaris (1972)

This made for really good accounting midterm study avoidance. I did the "Rented Criterion DVD" special, where I watch a super-long art film and then start it over right away to watch the commentary. Good six hours in toto.

Innumerable watch checks but they don't count because I was watching at home and I got clocks everywhere. Also, Tarkovsky's whole aesthetic was to shoot entire scenes in one long take. Partly motivated by only having enough film to get a scene that way (necessity of course being the mother of invention), the result is a real feeling of the passage of time in each scene, which might be bad if your movie is Transformers but isn't bad if your movie is about three guys seeing ghosts on an enormous space station.

And there's a totally great five-minute scene of a dude driving through what's supposed to be the "city of the future," except it's 1972 Japan. The commentators said this may have worked for a totally alien, futuristic city from the eyes of a relatively backward Russian audience and culture, but Western viewers were probably really confused. The new spin on this is, Tarkovsky clearly seems to think there's something *wrong* with people becoming slaves to technology, but I'm all for it! More iPhones!

3 Comments:

  • At 5:30 PM, Blogger ian said…

    Wait, are you telling me that George Clooney's sublime buttocks are not in this movie?! Because that was the whole reason I paid to see it in the theaters when we watched it.

     
  • At 12:32 AM, Blogger Jienan said…

    i have tarkovsky's 'scupting in time' book if you've never read it. excellent read...

    if you have a chance, rent 'stalker' as well... solaris maybe better but stalker is even more wtf for me...

    for long takes, check out 'werckmeister harmoniax' (sp) which i have on avi only (thanks torrents) or anything by angelopoulos... only times i don't check the watch at all...

    now, here's a question for you: why do you think soderbergh though it necessary to remake it? just wondering if you've seen his remake...

    i didn't get it myself but i'd like to hear / read your take on it...

     
  • At 2:23 PM, Blogger Jon said…

    Ian - No Clooney buttocks.

    Jienan - per Ian's comment, yes I've seen the remake. It seemed to be an odd contradiction to have it be so short and yet so slow moving. I really liked their futuristic but realistic Earth fashions though.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home